Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

State Rep. Ritter announces support for right-to-die bill

By Judy Benson

Publication: theday.com

Published February 05. 2013 6:00PM   Updated February 05. 2013 6:16PM

State Rep. Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, today announced her support for a right-to-die bill that will be considered by the Public Health Committee this session.

She was joined at a news conference with other legislators, clergy members, doctors and other advocates of the measure that would allow terminally ill, mentally competent patients the option of choosing life-ending medication.

“Patients should be able to make their own decisions about the final minutes of their lives. It’s their right and no one else’s,” Ritter said in a news release.

Barbara Coombs Lee, president of the advocacy group Compassion & Choices, said aid-in-dying laws in Oregon, Washington and now Montana are working as intended and none of the problems opponents predicted have come true.

According to the news release, only 673 people in Oregon have opted to take the life-ending medication done so in 15 years since the law’s passage. But thousands more take comfort just in knowing the option is available, according to Coombs Lee, who noted that end-of-life care has improved under the Oregon law.

The Connecticut bill would be based on Oregon and Washington state statutes, and would allow a terminally ill person with a diagnosis of less than six months to live, who is deemed mentally and psychologically competent, to get a prescription that can be self-administered for a humane and dignified death, supporters said.

The legislation would include protections to ensure that patients are not coerced or influenced in their decision-making.

News by Town

Most Recent Poll
Civil liberties groups decry a recently released Justice Department memo that justifies U.S. drone strikes against suspects abroad, including U.S. citizens, without proof of an imminent attack. What do you think of the policy?
I think our nation needs to use whatever weapons it has to protect itself from terrorists.
I think it's a slippery slope that makes the White House judge, jury and executioner.
I'm not sure. I do think the administration needs to be more transparent about this policy.
If it saves the lives of American troops, I'm all for it.
Number of votes: 495

No current items found