Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

Set rules, oversight for new tools of war

Published February 05. 2013 4:00AM

The Obama administration needs to do a better of job of transparency when it comes to the rules of engagement for utilizing drone attacks. There need to be rules and guidelines - the administration is reportedly working on them - and the public needs to know what they are. Only with greater transparency can the public judge whether the program of attacks by unmanned planes is being used to counter legitimate threats to the United States and its interests - or is being abused.

But instead of clarifying the policy on drone attacks, it appears the administration is preparing to double down with its secretive use of another weapon of modern warfare - cyber attacks. The New York Times reported Monday that an internal White House legal review has concluded the president has broad power to order pre-emptive cyber strikes if national security networks detect evidence of a looming attack on the United States.

The implications of a unilateral decision by a president to launch a cyber attack are more daunting than ordering drone attacks.

Drones and the collateral damage they cause are known to have turned local populations against U.S. interests. But a cyber attack could result in unpredictable escalation, disrupting vital infrastructure systems and threatening financial markets.

According to sources quoted by the Times, the new policy recognizes the seriousness of the damage that can be caused by cyber warfare and the potential repercussions, which is why the president must give authorization. But the public has the right to know what the standards are and where the lines are drawn. And what congressional oversight will there be? The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war and that holds true no matter how war is waged.

The public deserves a broader debate about how and when to use these new weapons of war.

News by Town

Most Recent Poll
Civil liberties groups decry a recently released Justice Department memo that justifies U.S. drone strikes against suspects abroad, including U.S. citizens, without proof of an imminent attack. What do you think of the policy?
I think our nation needs to use whatever weapons it has to protect itself from terrorists.
I think it's a slippery slope that makes the White House judge, jury and executioner.
I'm not sure. I do think the administration needs to be more transparent about this policy.
If it saves the lives of American troops, I'm all for it.
Number of votes: 495

No current items found